Capilano University Library Undergraduate Research Award 2024

Summary/abstract of their research project is included. (Yes/No)

Yes

NA

NA

Describes where they searched for information and how their search strategy changed over time.

Provides minimal information on where they searched (for example, a list of search engines or databases)

No reflection on their search strategy.

 Limited search techniques described, does not mention modifying searches

Explains where and how they searched but does not explain why they chose their search strategy in depth, or provides a very minimal reflection/explanation.

Mentions modifying searches iteratively

Explains where they searched and why they chose to search there

Explains how their search results changed their search strategy, or reflect on how they modified their strategy over time (examples: citation chaining, identifying specific authors and searching for them, trying different keywords, trying different databases/search engines)

Describes how they determined which experts or different perspectives they would include and which they would omit in their research.

Does not describe which expert voices or different voices to include, or utilizes only sources that are
consistent with original thesis,
assertions, or point of view

Describes how they determined which expert voices or different perspectives to include

Determined which experts or perspectives to consult with consideration of their specific research project

Examples:
- Accounts for pertinent knowledge or information encountered in the research process even if it challenged the student’s value system or counters their thesis argument,
- Considers discipline-specific research standards,
- or where possible, sought out voices from equity-seeking groups

Provides appropriate criteria for evaluation of sources consulted.

Does not identify criteria for evaluating sources

Criteria for evaluation of sources incomplete or unclear

Articulates a well-constructed criteria for evaluating the authority and quality of sources

Provides insight into how the project contributed to their growth and/or what they learned and would do differently.

No description of insights or lessons learned

Insights and lessons learned are acknowledged but not fully addressed

Insights and lessons are described in depth, in relation to the project

Demonstrate reflection and consideration of the research process